Mini-Gastric Bypass

The Mini-Gastric Bypass Surgery


Short, Simple, Effective

Short, Simple, Effective Weight Loss Surgery

Protect Against Cancer

Home Up Patient Emails Search Contact Us Compare MGB

Call Dr. Rutledge 702-714-0011 or Email: DrR@clos.net

Call Dr. Peraglie 407-922-3424 or Email: DrP@clos.net

Follow Us on FaceBook

Watch Our Videos on YouTube

Follow Us on Twitter

Start Here

Win Free iPad
Follow Up

Talk with 1,000s
of MGB patients

Join Us on FaceBook or Myspace

Chat with
MGB patients

Patient
Application
Form

Watch MGB
Animation

Watch 100s
of Videos

Got Lap-Band
Problems?

How Much
Does it Cost

Best Weight
Loss Surgery

$9,500
Same Day MGB

Search

Mailing List

Pictures

MGB Papers

Daily Emails

PreOp
Process

MGB Manual

Meet Our
Patients

Patient
Application

THE Notebook!

MGB Video

Our Brochure

Search

Follow Up

MGB vs RNY

Research

Take Survey

Discharge
Instructions

Home
Up

 

 
Int J Cancer. 2007 Oct 1;121(7):1618-23.Click here to read Links
 

Cereal fiber intake may reduce risk of gastric adenocarcinomas: the EPIC-EURGAST study.

Department of Epidemiology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona (ICO-IDIBELL), Spain.

Numerous case-control studies suggest dietary fiber may reduce risk of gastric cancer, but this has not been confirmed prospectively. A previous case-control study reported reduced risk of gastric cardia adenocarcinomas associated with cereal fiber, but not with fruit or vegetable fiber. To date, different food sources of fiber have not been examined with respect to noncardia tumors or diverse histologic sub-types. This study prospectively examines associations between fiber from different food sources and incident gastric adenocarcinomas (GC) among more than 435,000 subjects from 10 countries participating in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. Subjects aged 25-70 years completed dietary questionnaires in 1992-98, and were followed up for a median of 6.7 years. About 312 incident GCs were observed. The relative risk of GC was estimated based on cohort-wide sex-specific fiber intake quartiles using proportional hazards models to estimate hazards ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Intakes of cereal fiber, but not total, fruit or vegetable fiber, were associated with reduced GC risk [adjusted HR for the highest vs. lowest quartile of cereal fiber 0.69, 0.48-0.99]. There was a strong inverse association for diffuse [HR 0.43, 0.22-0.86], but not intestinal type [HR 0.98, 0.54-1.80] tumors. Associations for cardia vs. noncardia tumors were similar to those for overall GC, although cardia associations did not reach significance. Cereal fiber consumption may help to reduce risk of GC, particularly diffuse type tumors. Further study on different food sources of fiber in relation to GC risk is warranted to confirm these relationships.

PMID: 17582605 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

 

 
Cancer Causes Control. 2007 Sep;18(7):713-22. Epub 2007 Jun 12.Click here to read Links
 

Fiber intake and risk of adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and stomach.

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, MS#44, Los Angeles, CA 90089-9175, USA. annawu@hsc.usc.edu

BACKGROUND: Since the 1970s, incidence rates for esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinomas have risen substantially for reasons that are not well understood. We sought to determine the role of dietary factors in these tumor types. METHODS: This analysis on dietary factors included 206 esophageal adenocarcinoma, 257 gastric cardia, 366 distal gastric adenocarcinoma patients and, 1,308 control subjects from a population-based, case-control study conducted in Los Angeles County. Polytomous logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs), as an estimate of the relative risk, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the three tumor types. RESULTS: Intake of fiber had a significant impact on risk of esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma after adjustment for age, gender, race, birthplace, education, cigarette smoking, body size, history of reflux, and vitamin use. Compared to subjects in the lowest quartile of fiber intake, subjects in the highest quartile of intake showed odd ratios of 0.44 (95% CI = 0.26-0.76) for esophageal adenocarcinoma (P trend = 0.004) and 0.58 (95% CI = 0.38-0.88) for gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (P trend = 0.016); these inverse associations remained after further adjustment for intake of fat. Positive associations between dietary fat and the three tumor types weakened after adjustment for fiber intake and were no longer statistically significant. For distal gastric cancer, a significant inverse association with fiber was observed only after adjustment for fat intake. The significant inverse associations with fiber remained after further adjustment for H. pylori infection for all three tumor types. CONCLUSIONS: High intake of fiber was associated with significant reduced risks of esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma even after adjustment for dietary fat, H. pylori infection and other covariates.

PMID: 17562192 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE

 

 
Cancer Causes Control. 2003 Aug;14(6):547-58.Click here to read Links
 

Case-control study of diet and other risk factors for gastric cancer in Hawaii (United States).

Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA. abe@crch.hawaii.edu

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of diet and other factors with gastric adenocarcinoma of the distal stomach. METHODS: Three hundred cases and 446 population-based controls were interviewed with a quantitative, food frequency questionnaire, which listed over 250 foods. The questionnaire also included information on smoking history, alcohol intake, education, medical history, medication use, and a family history of cancer. RESULTS: Cigarette smoking, family history of gastric cancer and personal history of gastric ulcer were positively associated with gastric cancer, while education and past use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were inversely related to risk. The consumption of all vegetables, mainly dark green, light green, and yellow vegetables, reduced risk. Many of these vegetables contain beta-carotene, vitamin C, vitamin E or folate, which were also inversely related to gastric cancer risk. When these nutrients were analyzed simultaneously, the inverse association was mainly with beta-carotene. The intake of processed meats and bacon was positively associated with gastric cancer risk, but primarily in men. When we simultaneously adjusted these meats for the intake of the different vegetables, the association was no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide additional support that the consumption of dark green and yellow vegetables are protective against adenocarcinoma of the distal stomach.

PMID: 12948286 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE

 

 
Curr Oncol Rep. 2003 May;5(3):192-202.Links
 

Nutrition and diet in the development of gastrointestinal cancer.

Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, 1515 N Campbell Avenue, PO Box 245024, Tucson, AZ 85724-5024, USA. cthomson@u.arizona.edu

Diet plays a role in the prevention and development of gastrointestinal cancers. The majority of available research consists of case-control studies, but the number of clinical trials is growing. The dietary recommendations to reduce gastrointestinal cancer risk include lowering total energy, fat, and saturated fat intake; avoidance of grilled and smoked foods; avoidance of alcohol; and increasing intake of fruits, vegetables, and fiber. Studies of esophageal cancer support these dietary approaches, with the exception of dietary fat reduction and increased green tea intake. For gastric cancer, consuming additional fruits and vegetables, including those high in ascorbic acid, may reduce risk, and the capacity for diet to alter Helicobacter pylori infection should be explored.

PMID: 12667416 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE

 

 
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001 Oct;10(10):1055-62.Click here to read Links
 

Nutrient intake and risk of subtypes of esophageal and gastric cancer.

Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8034, USA. Susan.Mayne@Yale.Edu

Incidence rates for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia have been rising rapidly. We examined nutrient intake as a risk factor for esophageal and gastric cancers in a population-based case-control study in Connecticut, New Jersey, and western Washington state. Interviews were completed for cases with histologically confirmed esophageal adenocarcinoma (n = 282), adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia (n = 255), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (n = 206), and noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma (n = 352), along with population controls (n = 687). Associations between nutrient intake and risk of cancer were estimated by adjusted odds ratios (ORs), comparing the 75th versus the 25th percentile of intake. The following nutrients were significantly inversely associated with risk of all four tumor types: fiber, beta-carotene, folate, and vitamins C and B6. In contrast, dietary cholesterol, animal protein, and vitamin B12 were significantly positively associated with risk of all four tumor types. Dietary fat [OR, 2.18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.27-3.76] was significantly associated with risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma only. Dietary nitrite (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.26-2.16) was associated with noncardia gastric cancer only. Vitamin C supplement use was associated with a significantly lower risk for noncardia gastric cancer (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41-0.88). Higher intake of nutrients found primarily in plant-based foods was associated with a reduced risk of adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastric cardia, whereas higher intake of nutrients found primarily in foods of animal origin was associated with an increased risk.

PMID: 11588131 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE

 

 
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Mar 1;98(5):345-54.Click here to read Links
 

Meat intake and risk of stomach and esophageal adenocarcinoma within the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).

Department of Epidemiology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain. cagonzalez@ico.scs.es

BACKGROUND: Dietary factors are thought to have an important role in gastric and esophageal carcinogenesis, but evidence from cohort studies for such a role is lacking. We examined the risks of gastric cancer and esophageal adenocarcinoma associated with meat consumption within the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort.

METHODS: A total of 521,457 men and women aged 35-70 years in 10 European countries participated in the EPIC cohort. Dietary and lifestyle information was collected at recruitment. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine associations between meat intake and risks of cardia and gastric non-cardia cancers and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Data from a calibration substudy were used to correct hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for diet measurement errors. In a nested case-control study, we examined interactions between Helicobacter pylori infection status (i.e., plasma H. pylori antibodies) and meat intakes. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 6.5 years, 330 gastric adenocarcinoma and 65 esophageal adenocarcinomas were diagnosed.

Gastric non-cardia cancer risk was statistically significantly associated with intakes of total meat (calibrated HR per 100-g/day increase = 3.52; 95% CI = 1.96 to 6.34), red meat (calibrated HR per 50-g/day increase = 1.73; 95% CI = 1.03 to 2.88), and processed meat (calibrated HR per 50-g/day increase = 2.45; 95% CI = 1.43 to 4.21).

The association between the risk of gastric non-cardia cancer and total meat intake was especially large in H. pylori-infected subjects (odds ratio per 100-g/day increase = 5.32; 95% CI = 2.10 to 13.4).

Intakes of total, red, or processed meat were not associated with the risk of gastric cardia cancer. A positive but non-statistically significant association was observed between esophageal adenocarcinoma cancer risk and total and processed meat intake in the calibrated model.

In this study population, the absolute risk of development of gastric adenocarcinoma within 10 years for a study subject aged 60 years was 0.26% for the lowest quartile of total meat intake and 0.33% for the highest quartile of total meat intake.

CONCLUSION: Total, red, and processed meat intakes were associated with an increased risk of gastric non-cardia cancer, especially in H. pylori antibody-positive subjects, but not with cardia gastric cancer.

PMID: 16507831 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE

 

 
Int J Cancer. 2006 May 15;118(10):2559-66.Click here to read Links
 
Comment in:
Int J Cancer. 2006 Dec 15;119(12):2991; author reply 2992.

Home Up Patient Emails Search Contact Us Compare MGB
This notice describes how information about you may be used and disclosed and how you can gain access to this information.  Please review carefully


Contact Information: -Telephones: *** CLOS West: 702-714-0011, *** CLOS Florida: Flo Ballengee 863-899-3463, Dr. Peraglie 407-922-3424


Email Us Anytime for Help:
Email: Everyone@clos.net or CLOSLasVegas@clos.net *** CLOS West DrR@clos.net, or CLOSLasVegas@clos.net *** CLOS Florida: Flo Ballengee Flo@clos.net, Dr. Peraglie DrP@clos.net


Addresses:
Address: *** CLOS West: Dr. Rutledge / CELOS, 98 E Lake Mead Parkway, Suite 302, Henderson NV 89015, Telephone: 702-714-0011 Fax: 702-456-1173, Email: DrR@clos.net, Everyone@clos.net or CLOSLasVegas@clos.net *** CLOS Florida: 40124 Highway 27, Suite 203, Davenport, FL 33837, Flo Ballengee 863-899-3463, Flo@clos.net, Dr. Peraglie 407-922-3424 DrP@clos.net


Warning: Gastric Bypass Surgery is a MAJOR surgical procedure. It can be associated with significant risks and complications, up to and including death. Weight loss surgery is a rapidly developing area of medicine. Bariatric surgery is filled with controversy. It is very important to take a careful and deliberate approach to considering surgery for the treatment of obesity.  

Disclaimer Notice:-Information on this web site is provided for informational purposes only.
-It is imperative that you consult your own physician regarding the applicability of any opinions or recommendations with respect to your symptoms or medical condition.
-Contact with this web site or Dr. Rutledge over the web site does not constitute a doctor patient relationship and for good quality medical care you must obtain advice and consultation form your own local physician.
-This site is intended as a resource for references on the treatment of obesity for health care professionals and educated consumers.
-The authors and editors have used sources believed to be reliable in their efforts to provide information that is complete and generally in accord with the standards accepted at the time of publication.
-Medical knowledge changes rapidly. In view of the possibility of human error or changes in medical science, neither the authors nor the editors nor any other party who has been involved in the preparation or publication of this work warrants that the information contained herein is in every respect accurate or complete, and they are not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information.
This information is not medical advice or diagnosis, nor is it to be construed as medical advice, medical information, medical diagnosis, or medical prescription for curing, removing, or preventing any disease, or related symptoms. You must seek the direct assistance, advice and evaluation of your own personal physician before acting on any information found herein. These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.
-Readers are Strongly encouraged to discuss and confirm the information contained herein with your own physician.
Copyright © 1998 The Center for Laparoscopic Obesity Surgery