Gastric Cancer Surgeon Routinely Uses MGB Type Billroth II

Cancer Surgeon Shows Treatment of Gastric Cancer Copying the Technique described by Rutledge for the MGB
Using a technique like the MGB: A total of 399 patients underwent LDG with Billroth-II reconstruction for gastric cancer between April 2004 and March 2011.
J Korean Surg Soc. 2012 Mar;82(3):135-42. Epub 2012 Feb 27.

Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and totally laparoscopic Billroth-II distal gastrectomy forgastric cancer.

Source

Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

In laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer, most surgeons prefer extra-corporeal anastomosis because of technical challenges and unfamiliarity with intra-corporeal anastomosis. Herein, we report the feasibility and safety of intra-corporeal Billroth-II anastomosis in gastric cancer.

METHODS:

From April 2004 to March 2011, 130 underwent totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with intra-corporeal Billroth-II reconstruction, and 269 patients underwent laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with extra-corporeal Billroth-II reconstruction. Surgical efficacies and outcomes between two groups were compared.

Rx of Gastric Cancer: Billroth II Like MGB Technique of Dr Rutledge
Note: Rx of Gastric Cancer: Billroth II Like MGB Technique of Dr Rutledge

Fig. 1

Brief illustration of intra-corporeal Billroth-II anastomosis. (A) Resection of the stomach using linear stapler. (B) Making entry hole at the tip of greater curvature side. (C) Making entry hole at the jejunum, about 10 to 15 cm from Treitz ligament. (D) Approximation of the stomach and jejunum using linear stapler. (E) Closure of the entry holes using linear stapler. (F) Completion of gastrojejunostomy, antecolic fashion.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3294106/figure/F1/

See: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3294106/?tool=pubmed

and

RESULTS:

There were no differences in demographics and clinicopathological characteristics. The mean operation and reconstruction times of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy were statistically shorter than laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (P = 0.019; P < 0.001). Anastomosis-related complications were observed in 11 (8.5%) totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and 21 (7.8%) laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy patients, and the incidence of these events was not significantly different. Post-operative hospital stays for totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy were shorter than laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy patients (8.3 ± 3.2 days vs. 9.9 ± 5.3 days, respectively; P = 0.016), and the number of times parenteral analgesic administration was required in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy patients was more frequent after surgery.

CONCLUSION:

Intra-corporeal Billroth-II anastomosis is a feasible procedure and can be safely performed with the proper experience for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. This method may be less time consuming and may produce a more cosmetic result.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s