Meta-analysis of trials of calcium supplements, and found a 27-31% increase in risk of myocardial infarction and a 12-20% increase in risk of stroke.

Osteoporos Int. 2011 Jun;22(6):1649-58. Epub 2011 Mar 16.

Cardiovascular effects of calcium supplementation.

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, i.reid@auckland.ac.nz

Abstract

Trials in normal older women and in patients with renal impairment suggest that

calcium supplements increase the risk of cardiovascular disease.

To further assess their safety, we recently conducted a meta-analysis of trials of calcium supplements, and

found a 27-31% increase in risk of myocardial infarction and a

12-20% increase in risk of stroke.

These findings are robust because they are based on pre-specified analyses of randomized, placebo-controlled trials and show consistent risk across the trials.

The fact that cardiovascular events were not primary endpoints of any of these studies will introduce noise but not bias into the data. A recent re-analysis of the Women’s Health Initiative suggests that

co-administration of vitamin D with calcium does not lessen these adverse effects.

The increased cardiovascular risk with calcium supplements is consistent with epidemiological data relating higher circulating calcium concentrations to cardiovascular disease in normal populations.

There are several possible pathophysiological mechanisms for these effects, including effects on vascular calcification, on the function of vascular cells, and on blood coagulation. Calcium-sensing receptors might mediate some of these effects. Because calcium supplements produce small reductions in fracture risk and a small increase in cardiovascular risk, there may be no net benefit from their use.

Food sources of calcium appear to produce similar benefits on bone density, although their effects on fracture are unclear.

Since food sources have not been associated with adverse cardiovascular effects,

they may be preferable.

Available evidence suggests that other osteoporosis treatments are still effective without calcium co-administration.

 
 
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s